The First Veto. For four and a half years, George Bush has never exercised one of the most powerful of Presidential powers: the veto. Congress has mostly been Bush's loyal accomplice in the pro-wealthy, pro-war agenda of the GOP, so there's simply been no need. That may change. Bush has promised to veto a new bill passed in the Senate, 90-9, which bars the use of "cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment of persons under custody or control of the United States government." The bill's sponsor, conservative John McCain (who passes for a "moderate" in our backwards, right-tilted world), says the point of the bill is two-fold: 1) send a message to the world that the USA does not tolerate torture and 2) tell our soldiers exactly what kind of conduct is permissible when interviewing detainees. On both points, of course John McCain is correct. Bush doesn't care. His entire foreign policy has been built about not giving one lick about what the world thinks. To him, the only people's opinions who matter are his base of conservative Christian Republicans. Second, Bush doesn't want soldiers to stop using torture. The Bush Administration simply doesn't care or respect the fundamental dignity that every human life has. Despite claiming to be Christians, they violate the tenents of their believes by condoning torture. Torture isn't being kept around because it works. It doesn't. Study after study shows that torture results in bad information. Even if it does work, it's immoral. Torture is being maintained because an old-boys network has always done it that way. The threat of torture, unfortunately, may be seen to serve as a deterrent. Yet another example of why George Bush is a giant hypocrite. |
Top Twenty
- 1. Daily Kos
- 2. 538.com (Nate Silver)
- 2. Eschaton (Atrios)
- 3. Huffington Post
- 4. Juan Cole
- 5. The Black Commentator
- 6. This Modern World
- 7. AMERICAblog
- 8. Talking Points Memo -- Joshua Marshall
- 9. TalkLeft
- 10. MyDD
- 11. ed fitzgerald's unfutz
- 12. Eschaton (Atrios)
- 13. Hoffmania
- 14. Pharyngula
- 15. Billmon
- 16. Eric Alterman
- 17. Unclaimed Territory
- 18. Bartcop
- 19. Left in the West
- 20. The Blog From Another Dimension
Recommended News Resources
- Buzzflash!
- The Nation
- The Texas Observer Allafrica.com
- Corporate Crime Reporter Cosmoetica
- Mother Jones Narco News
- Nowpublic Open Democracy
- Today in Iraq Tom Paine
AltWeeklies.com
American Reporter
Am. Politics Journal
Antiwar.com
Arts Journal
Bear Left!
Black Commentator
Bush Watch
Capitol Hill Blue
Common Dreams
ConWebWatch
Consortium News
Corante
CrimeLynx
Cursor
Death Penalty Information Center
Democratic Underground
Dissident Voice
Drudge Retort
Drugwar.com
Eat the State
Econ in Crisis
Failure
The Gadflyer
Grist
History News Network
Hollywood Investigator
Identity Theory
Intervention
The Jackson Progressive
Liberal Oasis
MedialChannel
Memory Hole
Michael Moore
Military Week
The Morning News
New American Media
The New Standard
No Logo
PopMatters
Pop Politics
Press Action
Progressive Review
Raw Story
The Revealer
Salon
Scoop
Slate
Sp!ked
Take Back The Media
The Daily Planet
The Smoking Gun
Truthdig
Truthout
Unknown News
What Really Happened
Wired News
Working for Change
News Services
- Agence France-Presse
- Alternet
- AP
- BBC
- Google News
- Inter Press Service
- Indy Media
- Knight Ridder
- Reuters
- UN
Reference
Government Reference
-
U.S.Constitution
Bill of Rights and Amendments
Contact President Bush
Find Your Representatives
House Web Sites
Senate Web Sites
Blogroll
- Feedster Top 500 Blogs
- The Agonist
- Alas, a Blog
- Amnesty's Death Penalty Blog
- annatopia
- Asian American Empowerment: ModelMinority.com
- Balkinization
- Bartcop
- Billmon
- Blog of the Moderate Left
- The Blogging of the President
- Brains and Eggs
- Brilliant at Breakfast
- Burnt Orange
- The Carpetbagger Report
- David Corn
- Democratic Veteran
- Demagogue
- DMI Blog
- DownWithTyranny
- Easter Lemming Liberal News
- Effect Measure
- Electronic Darwinism
- Emerging Democratic Majority
- Enivornmental and Urban Economics
- ePluribus Media Community
- Eric Alterman
- feministing
- First Draft
- From the Roots
- Gropinator
- Happy Tulip's Xanga Site
- Sister Helen Prejean
- ImpeachBushCoalition
- Informed Dissent
- itlookslikethis
- Just Another Blog
- kid oakland
- Left in the West
- LeftyBlogs.com
- Liberal Street Fighter
mediagirl.org
- Mark Crispin Miller
- Mathew Gross
- The OCD Gen X Liberal
- Orcinus
- Orwell's Grave
- Peking Duck
- Political Cortex
- The Poor Man
- Progressive Blog Digest
- Public Intelligence
- Reaction, The
- Red State Rabble
- Religious Liberal Blog, A
- Republic of T
- The Rude Pundit
- Running Scared
- Sadly, No!
- Say No to Pombo
- ScaramoucheBlog
Skimble
skippy the bush kangaroo
- sustainablog
- Talk Left
- Taylor Marsh/a>
- A Thought Vacuum
- Truth Serum Blog
- Unclaimed Territory
- Upper Left
- Various Miseries
- Washington Note, The
- White Man Ranting
- World Changing
- Zaphod's Heads
- DMI Blog
Organizations Fighting Corporate Evil
- ACLU
- Americans United For Separation of Church and State
- ATLA
- Buy Blue
- CensorBush.org
- Center for American Progress
- Center for Media & Democracy
- ComcastWatch
- Consumers Union
- CorpWatch
- Democrats.org
- Fair.org
- Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights
- House Democrats' Committee on Government Reform
- Human Rights Watch
- Media Matters for America
- National Organization for Women
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- OpenSecrets
- People For the American Way
- Progressive Democrats of America
- Public Citizen
- Think Progress
- Union of Concerned Scientists
- Union Voice
- WakeUp Walmart
Law Blogs
- ACSBlog
- Arbitrary and Capricious
- Capital Defense Weekly
- CrimProf Blog
- Decision of the Day
- Discourse.net
- Is That Legal?
- The Legal Reader
- Public Defender Dude
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs
- SCOTUSBlog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
For Laughs
Recent Battles in the War on Corporate Evil
- Did Bush Out Plame?George Stephanopoulos mentioned...
- Harriet Miers: Completely IncompetentWhat's the pr...
- DEMOCRACY: DEAD OR ALIVEPart 4 of 5Racism and Thie...
- Halliburton: An Example of the Pro-Welfare, Anti-F...
- DEMOCRACY: DEAD OR ALIVEPart 3 of 5The Court Goes ...
- A Raw Deal. Republicans Plan to Exploit the Ka...
- Unthinkable:Karl Rove to Head Katrina Reconstructi...
- Revealed as PropagandaColumnist David Brooks revea...
- A Foul Mess The Republican War on Superfund dire...
- The Republican Party: Helping Big Oil at All Costs...
Archives
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- August 2008
- September 2008
- November 2008
- January 2012
- June 2013
Corporate Tool Archive
California Resources
San Francisco News
-
Beyond Chron
East Bay Express
Marin Independent Journal Oakland Tribune
SF Bay Guardian
SF Chronicle
SF Examiner
SF Sentinel
SF Weekly
San Jose Mercury News
The Usual Suspects
- SF Indy Media
- SF Bay Area Indy Media Center
- The Bay Area is Talking
San Francisco Resources
American Newspapers
-
Todays Papers
Boston Globe
Chicago Tribune
Detroit Free Press
LA Times
Miami Herald
NY Daily News
NY Newsday
NY Post
NY Sun
NY Times
The Oregonian
Phil Inquirer
Pioneer Press
SP Times
USA Today
Washington Post
Wall Street Journal
International Newspapers
-
NewsLink
Asia Times (HK)
Globe and Mail
Guardian/Observer
The Independent
London Times
Moscow Times
Other Foreign
Pravda (Eng.)
Telegraph U.K.
Times of India
Toronto Star
Magazines
- American Prospect
- Atlantic Monthly
- The Baffler
- Billboard
- Bust
- The Economist
- Found
- Harper's Index
- In These Times
- Left Business Observer
- McSweeney's
- Modern Drunkard
- Mother Jones
- The Nation
- The New Republic
- New Statesman
- New York
- The New Yorker
- Newsweek
- NY Observer
- The Progressive
- Progressive Populist
- Radar
- Reason
- Roll Call
- Time
- US News
- Utne
- Variety
- Wash Monthly
- Weekly Standard
Comments on ""
I bet one of the reasons he plans to veto it is because it will just expose our soldiers, who have already suffered a lot, to more prosecution/ prison terms at home. You can't really apply civilian standards to people in war, after all they're killing people indiscriminantly, and being kileld indiscriminantly - how humane is that? I think you have to think of the 18 year old enlisted soldier when you view this bill (we send them to war and then send them to prison when they get home?) but coming from McCain (a Hanoi Hilton guest) it does carry a lot more weight than it would if it were from someone trying to play armchair general.
This bill in no way shape or form exposes our soldiers. All it does is prevent "cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment of persons under custody or control of the United States government." Torture is never occurring when soldiers are defending themselves, as you seem to imply. Torture is only occurring behind closed doors and against people completed subject to the control of our military.
The non-use of torture is not a "civilian standard." It is a war time standard adopted by the Geneva Conventions. No rational reason exists for torturing those in custody, and you certainly didn't give me a reason to refute.
If anything, this bill will help our soldiers because, should they get captured, their captors will know that the USA does not condone torture and will be more likely to spare our soldiers torture.
This bill is not going to subject our soldiers to prosecution at home as long as they obey the law. Torture is NOT occuring because of the acts of a few random soldiers (as the VRWC would like you to believe.) Torture is occurring because it is being ordered by the highest levels of the military and can be traced back to Bush's secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld.
against a conventional enemy, of course the geneva convention would apply (all 3 requirements would be met) and we would be well advised to adhere to it because, as you stated, we would want our soldiers to be protected by it too.
Al Qaeda doesn't meet the requirements, and they've decapitated everyone that even resembled an enemy (our so called captors will not give a shit what standards the US has for their captives, they will be too busy slitting the throat, pausing for minute to increase the pain and sufering, and then continuing with the decapitation, I watch the videos). Where's the quid pro quo of us limiting ourselves by taking "punishment or degrading behavior" off the table, leaving torture aside for the moment.
And I agree with you on your last point, it's the old men who make all the rules (like this bill) and orders that the young men in combat have to obey, but it will be some young teenager who will be made a scapegoat and sent to prison for violating this bill
All this bill bans is "cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment." Regardless of whether or not the Geneva Conventions apply, we as a nation don't need to torture people to get what we need.
Soldiers aren't going to be charged for all sorts of crimes under this bill. The greater good of this people is eradicating the use of a terrorist tactic, torture, from the practices of the United States. Certainly that outweighs any concerns that soldiers will get charged with crimes. Once their superiors aren't ordering torture anymore, soldiers won't be committing acts of torture.