33 Years of Choice Unable to find a doctor willing to expose himself to criminal charges, a young girl's quest to avoid teenage motherhood takes a disturbing turn. She turns to the black market, composed primarily of drug dealers and weapons peddlers, to find someone willing to terminate her pregnancy. In the worst part of town, a dirty table in a musty room provides the girl with her only hope of choice. All alone, the girl lays down on the cold table. She hands over a wad of cash. A man, lacking any medical experience, "sanitizes" his instrument by running it under hot water for a few moments. He then unravels his instrument, a rusty coat hanger, and plunges it inside the girl. The horrific tearing of her interior sends the girl into horrific pain. Blood gushes everywhere and the man starts to panic. Within minutes, the girl is no more. Her cold, emotionless, dead body is all that remains. This story happened every day before Roe v. Wade guaranteed women the right to choose. Today is the 33 year anniversary of this landmark Supreme Court decision. The Court correctly forced states to follow the Constitution and uphold a woman's private right to make her own decisions regarding her medical care. Every poll indicates that a super-majority of Americans favor choice and oppose governmental restrictions on valid medical procedures. But across a sea of red states, groups inspired by religion alone seek to enforce their beliefs and others. These radicals seek to change the law via a novel Constitutional theory. Under so-called "originalism," precedent means nothing and the only Constitutional interpretation that matters is that of the majority of the current Supreme Court. 33 years of established jurisprudence are irrelevant in the eyes of these madmen. President Bush is the leader of this group. Today Bush publicly showed his flagrant disrespect for the rule of the law and the Supreme Court in general. Bush declared the anniversary of Roe v. Wade "National Sanctity of Human Life Day." Not only does this day contradict the law of the United States, it actively mixes religion with law: When we seek to advance science and improve our lives, we must always preserve human dignity and remember that human life is a gift from our Creator. We must not sanction the creation of life only to destroy it. What if you don't "remember that human life is a gift from our Creator" because you don't believe that? In Bush's version of America, you don't count. The Constitution itself doesn't count, only the religious beliefs of the minority in America who seek to replace the law with the King James Bible. In his declaration, Bush brags about all the work he has done to weaken Roe and steal women's Constitutional rights: America is making great strides in our efforts to protect human life. One of my first actions as President was to sign an order banning the use of taxpayer money on programs that promote abortion overseas. Over the past 5 years, I also have been proud to sign into law the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, and a ban on partial-birth abortion. America is making great strides in Bush's efforts to steal women's rights in favor of flagrant violations of the separation between church and state. It's fundamentally un-American to use religion as the sole justification for undermining the settled law of the Supreme Court. Today is an important holiday and Bush's disgraceful proclamation is yet another reason why you can be certain that both Roberts and Alito will vote to overturn Roe. |
Top Twenty
- 1. Daily Kos
- 2. 538.com (Nate Silver)
- 2. Eschaton (Atrios)
- 3. Huffington Post
- 4. Juan Cole
- 5. The Black Commentator
- 6. This Modern World
- 7. AMERICAblog
- 8. Talking Points Memo -- Joshua Marshall
- 9. TalkLeft
- 10. MyDD
- 11. ed fitzgerald's unfutz
- 12. Eschaton (Atrios)
- 13. Hoffmania
- 14. Pharyngula
- 15. Billmon
- 16. Eric Alterman
- 17. Unclaimed Territory
- 18. Bartcop
- 19. Left in the West
- 20. The Blog From Another Dimension
Recommended News Resources
- Buzzflash!
- The Nation
- The Texas Observer Allafrica.com
- Corporate Crime Reporter Cosmoetica
- Mother Jones Narco News
- Nowpublic Open Democracy
- Today in Iraq Tom Paine
AltWeeklies.com
American Reporter
Am. Politics Journal
Antiwar.com
Arts Journal
Bear Left!
Black Commentator
Bush Watch
Capitol Hill Blue
Common Dreams
ConWebWatch
Consortium News
Corante
CrimeLynx
Cursor
Death Penalty Information Center
Democratic Underground
Dissident Voice
Drudge Retort
Drugwar.com
Eat the State
Econ in Crisis
Failure
The Gadflyer
Grist
History News Network
Hollywood Investigator
Identity Theory
Intervention
The Jackson Progressive
Liberal Oasis
MedialChannel
Memory Hole
Michael Moore
Military Week
The Morning News
New American Media
The New Standard
No Logo
PopMatters
Pop Politics
Press Action
Progressive Review
Raw Story
The Revealer
Salon
Scoop
Slate
Sp!ked
Take Back The Media
The Daily Planet
The Smoking Gun
Truthdig
Truthout
Unknown News
What Really Happened
Wired News
Working for Change
News Services
- Agence France-Presse
- Alternet
- AP
- BBC
- Google News
- Inter Press Service
- Indy Media
- Knight Ridder
- Reuters
- UN
Reference
Government Reference
-
U.S.Constitution
Bill of Rights and Amendments
Contact President Bush
Find Your Representatives
House Web Sites
Senate Web Sites
Blogroll
- Feedster Top 500 Blogs
- The Agonist
- Alas, a Blog
- Amnesty's Death Penalty Blog
- annatopia
- Asian American Empowerment: ModelMinority.com
- Balkinization
- Bartcop
- Billmon
- Blog of the Moderate Left
- The Blogging of the President
- Brains and Eggs
- Brilliant at Breakfast
- Burnt Orange
- The Carpetbagger Report
- David Corn
- Democratic Veteran
- Demagogue
- DMI Blog
- DownWithTyranny
- Easter Lemming Liberal News
- Effect Measure
- Electronic Darwinism
- Emerging Democratic Majority
- Enivornmental and Urban Economics
- ePluribus Media Community
- Eric Alterman
- feministing
- First Draft
- From the Roots
- Gropinator
- Happy Tulip's Xanga Site
- Sister Helen Prejean
- ImpeachBushCoalition
- Informed Dissent
- itlookslikethis
- Just Another Blog
- kid oakland
- Left in the West
- LeftyBlogs.com
- Liberal Street Fighter
mediagirl.org
- Mark Crispin Miller
- Mathew Gross
- The OCD Gen X Liberal
- Orcinus
- Orwell's Grave
- Peking Duck
- Political Cortex
- The Poor Man
- Progressive Blog Digest
- Public Intelligence
- Reaction, The
- Red State Rabble
- Religious Liberal Blog, A
- Republic of T
- The Rude Pundit
- Running Scared
- Sadly, No!
- Say No to Pombo
- ScaramoucheBlog
Skimble
skippy the bush kangaroo
- sustainablog
- Talk Left
- Taylor Marsh/a>
- A Thought Vacuum
- Truth Serum Blog
- Unclaimed Territory
- Upper Left
- Various Miseries
- Washington Note, The
- White Man Ranting
- World Changing
- Zaphod's Heads
- DMI Blog
Organizations Fighting Corporate Evil
- ACLU
- Americans United For Separation of Church and State
- ATLA
- Buy Blue
- CensorBush.org
- Center for American Progress
- Center for Media & Democracy
- ComcastWatch
- Consumers Union
- CorpWatch
- Democrats.org
- Fair.org
- Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights
- House Democrats' Committee on Government Reform
- Human Rights Watch
- Media Matters for America
- National Organization for Women
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- OpenSecrets
- People For the American Way
- Progressive Democrats of America
- Public Citizen
- Think Progress
- Union of Concerned Scientists
- Union Voice
- WakeUp Walmart
Law Blogs
- ACSBlog
- Arbitrary and Capricious
- Capital Defense Weekly
- CrimProf Blog
- Decision of the Day
- Discourse.net
- Is That Legal?
- The Legal Reader
- Public Defender Dude
- Real Lawyers Have Blogs
- SCOTUSBlog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
For Laughs
Recent Battles in the War on Corporate Evil
- Do Condi and Colin Make the Republicans a Diverse ...
- Free Speech and the Internet UPDATEYahoo! has chos...
- Free Speech and the InternetI. Bush = Big BrotherT...
- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. vs. George W. BushOn M...
- GOP Fights Gore's Straight Talk With LiesLast post...
- The Radical Bloc Emerges: John Roberts Sides With ...
- Al Gore: "It is imperative that respect for the ru...
- Samuel Alito: In His WordsHere's what Alito had to...
- ALITO'S HATRED OF THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE AND THE EQUA...
- Corporate Tool: Samuel AlitoToday the Senate begin...
Archives
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- August 2008
- September 2008
- November 2008
- January 2012
- June 2013
Corporate Tool Archive
California Resources
San Francisco News
-
Beyond Chron
East Bay Express
Marin Independent Journal Oakland Tribune
SF Bay Guardian
SF Chronicle
SF Examiner
SF Sentinel
SF Weekly
San Jose Mercury News
The Usual Suspects
- SF Indy Media
- SF Bay Area Indy Media Center
- The Bay Area is Talking
San Francisco Resources
American Newspapers
-
Todays Papers
Boston Globe
Chicago Tribune
Detroit Free Press
LA Times
Miami Herald
NY Daily News
NY Newsday
NY Post
NY Sun
NY Times
The Oregonian
Phil Inquirer
Pioneer Press
SP Times
USA Today
Washington Post
Wall Street Journal
International Newspapers
-
NewsLink
Asia Times (HK)
Globe and Mail
Guardian/Observer
The Independent
London Times
Moscow Times
Other Foreign
Pravda (Eng.)
Telegraph U.K.
Times of India
Toronto Star
Magazines
- American Prospect
- Atlantic Monthly
- The Baffler
- Billboard
- Bust
- The Economist
- Found
- Harper's Index
- In These Times
- Left Business Observer
- McSweeney's
- Modern Drunkard
- Mother Jones
- The Nation
- The New Republic
- New Statesman
- New York
- The New Yorker
- Newsweek
- NY Observer
- The Progressive
- Progressive Populist
- Radar
- Reason
- Roll Call
- Time
- US News
- Utne
- Variety
- Wash Monthly
- Weekly Standard
Comments on ""
This is a very good blog, well-written, well-researched. I admire you for your completeness. I tend to go from the gut, which lays me open to be filleted from time to time, but what the heck (see my comments/response on your excellent Martin Luther King post below). Cheers!
Roe v. Wade was not a well decided case. The basis for the so-called right to an abortion is based on this idea that Americans have a guaranteed right to privacy. Now sure, we'd like to think that is the case, and I'm sure the Founding Fathers would think the same, but, unfortunately, they forgot to actually write in the Constitution. The best the wrote down was the 4th Amendment, illegalizing an illegal search and seizure. Not exactly guaranteed privacy. The right to an abortion is on shaky grounds. It is not a matter of convienence or practicality; that abortion is somehow to the benefit of those who are aborted. It is an issue of Constitutional law. Roe v. Wade was a poor decision. The Constitutional is not clearly pro-life nor is it clearly pro-abortion, therefore, it is an issue for each state to decide on its own. To label it an issue of women's rights is to poorly understand the issue.
Here are some statistics which may surprise some people. If these statistics are to be believed it puts those who morally oppose abortion in a difficult situation when deciding whether abortion should be legal.
"Although abortion is outlawed in Brazil except in rare circumstances, the country has one of the highest abortion rates in the developing world. The Health Ministry estimates that 31 percent of all pregnancies end in abortion. That works out to about 1.4 million abortions a year, mostly clandestine.
In the United States, where abortion was legalized in 1973, about 25 percent of all pregnancies end in abortion. In the Netherlands, a country with some of the world's most liberal abortion laws, the ratio is closer to 10 percent."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060110/lf_nm/brazil_abortion_dc_5
Kevin W. never read the 9th amendment. It states:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
Using natural law and the previously recognized right to privacy inherent in substantive due process, a woman's right to choose her own course of medical procedures is protected by our Constitution.
Kevin W is using the kind of ultra-super-duper originalist line of thought that is perverting the law into a farce and threatening our collective freedoms. They ignore what the Constitution says, ignore precedent and then rewrite the law to do whatever conservatives want in the name of "the framers' intentions," regardless of whether or not the framers actually thought that way.
I thought Roe v. Wade was based on the 14th amendment?
Roe v. Wade is based on the due process clause of the 14th amendment, but I was just refuting Kevin's argument that "all enumerated rights are in the Constitution." The 9th amendment negates that line of argument.